![]() ![]() Sounds bad, until you get into the details. The second main claim was that Dirty Dough took some distinctive packaging that Crumbl felt constituted trademark infringement. That obviously isn’t the basis of any lawsuit that would be successful on the trademark claims, but is important because there was also the accusation of theft of trade secrets. First, the owner of Dirty Dough used to work for Crumbl. ![]() Crumbl’s suit against Dirty Dough claimed both theft of trade secrets and trademark infringement, the latter of which revolved around two major claims. In the middle of last year, we talked about an odd lawsuit between two bakeries, Crumbl and Dirty Dough. Mon, Oct 23rd 2023 07:45pm - Timothy Geigner ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |